CLJA portfolio readiness
Prepare to be first in line when Track 1 concludes.
Organize the roster now. LitCap underwrites, ranks, and categorizes the inventory so your attorneys know which individual cases are ready, which need work, and where to begin.
Roster organized before file review
Claims ranked for attorney action
Curability
Versioned to public criteria
Scope
Full inventory
Track
Track 1 + EO
Output
Ranked worklist
Monitoring
Event-driven
The readiness window
Build your position in line before Track 1 concludes.
When the next phase begins, the advantage belongs to firms that already know which claims are ready and which individual files need attention. Do that portfolio work now—not after the queue forms.
The timing is uncertain. Your preparation does not have to be.
LitCap turns the roster into a defensible case-preparation queue without promising a Track 1 completion date or outcome.
First-in-line readiness
Roster controlled
One deduplicated operating list with each claim accounted for.
Underwriting complete
Viability, documentation, curability, and case-specific risk assessed.
Claims ranked
The inventory ordered by readiness and the value of the next action.
Attorney work queued
Individual matters grouped into ready, cure, investigate, and stop-work categories.
Three-phase engagement
Underwrite the whole book in the right order.
Start with roster-level triage, spend full-file analysis only where it can change value, then maintain a portfolio view that stays tied to the current public framework.
Roster organization & ranking
Input · Roster data
Deduplicate the inventory, account for every claim, apply structural exclusions, and establish the order for full-file underwriting.
Claimant-level underwriting
Input · Selected claimant files
Verify diagnosis, presence, exposure-window fit, alternative causes, offsets, and documentation gaps for every claim above the agreed cutoff.
Attorney case-preparation queue
Input · Verified portfolio outputs
Deliver a working inventory organized by ready, cure, investigate, and stop-work categories, then keep it current as public criteria change.
The curability map
Fund the core. Cure the middle. Stop spending on the tail.
Blank fields are treated as unknown—not as failure. Structural exclusions can be identified from the roster before expensive file review begins.
| Tier | Class | Definition | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Documented | Required elements verified | Settlement-ready / fundable now |
| B | Curable | One material gap with a defined cure | Fund cure, then promote |
| C | Indeterminate | Multiple gaps, adverse facts, or unresolved support | Hold and rank by expected cure value |
| D | Structurally non-viable | Disqualifying or control-ending condition | Exit or exclude from full-file spend |
Deliverables
A portfolio your team—and capital—can inspect.
Ranked inventory
Every claimant classified, deduplicated, and ordered for the next dollar of analysis.
Evidence sheets
Claimant-level criteria, supporting records, unknowns, cure actions, and source classes.
Portfolio workspace
Filter by tier, disease group, documentation state, cure path, status, and value band.
Monitoring & re-scoring
Public docket and program changes trigger impact analysis and versioned portfolio updates.
CLJA underwriting registration
Get the roster organized before the queue forms.
Register for an underwriting consultation. We’ll discuss the current roster, portfolio size, documentation coverage, and how to produce a ranked case-preparation queue.
Do not submit claimant names, dates of birth, medical records, or other protected health information through this form.